JPMS Module Path question

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at
Thu Jun 15 14:18:08 UTC 2017

On 15/06/2017 13:44, Peter Kriens wrote:
> Thanks Alan.
> This link seems very out of date when I compare it with the actual drafts. Might be an idea to update, remove or mark it as stale?
That document is a summary of the changes for integrating modules into 
the JLS and JVMS. If you are looking for the actual changes to the JLS 
and JVMS then the drafts are linked from the next paragraph.

The summary document has been really useful to document several aspects 
of the proposed changes in advance of the actual changes to the specs. 
It will be familiar to those that have been tracking the JSR and EA 
builds over the last 20 months or so. I've found it particularly useful 
as a document to point the maintainers of tools at when there are 
questions about the binary format of a module declaration. I can't speak 
for Alex but I believe that it will be hollowed out to be just the 
summary of the changes.


More information about the jpms-spec-observers mailing list