JPMS Module Path question

Alex Buckley alex.buckley at
Thu Jun 15 19:00:32 UTC 2017

On 6/15/2017 4:51 AM, Peter Kriens wrote:
> Thanks, I’ve updated the document.

I find it hard to understand why the document persists in saying that 
the grammar of a module declaration is "sloppy" when I have explained 
the technical reason for the different productions.


More information about the jpms-spec-observers mailing list