JPMS Module Path question

Peter Kriens peter.kriens at
Fri Jun 16 06:56:54 UTC 2017

I removed it, it is a personal judgement/preference.

Kind regards,

	Peter Kriens

> On 15 Jun 2017, at 21:00, Alex Buckley <alex.buckley at> wrote:
> On 6/15/2017 4:51 AM, Peter Kriens wrote:
>> Thanks, I’ve updated the document.
> I find it hard to understand why the document persists in saying that the grammar of a module declaration is "sloppy" when I have explained the technical reason for the different productions.
> Alex

More information about the jpms-spec-observers mailing list