Neal Gafter neal at
Wed Jul 7 11:41:49 PDT 2010

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Mikael Grev <grev at> wrote:

> > Using "return" now complicates our ability to provide nonlocal
> > control flow in the future.
> Only if you expect to ever use only "return" as long return. I would never
> want to see that happen anyway, even "return return" is better, since that
> is the new "keyword" for a new concept.
> I think it is a bit backwards to introduce something new for a current
> thing to keep an option to have something current mean something new in the
> future.

"return" currently means return from the innermost method or constructor.
Supporting return across lambda boundaries would not change that.

More information about the lambda-dev mailing list