Removal of function types

Doug Lea dl at
Wed Jul 7 16:05:38 PDT 2010

On 07/07/10 13:18, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I suggest using this thread to comment on the removal of function types :-)

As one of the instigators-by-counter-example of function types,
I do wonder what the plan is for providing dozens if not
hundreds of SAM types for (parallel) aggregate operations.
As in my infamous workarounds at:


More information about the lambda-dev mailing list