Public defender methods and static inner classes in interfaces?
int19h at gmail.com
Mon Sep 13 20:56:02 PDT 2010
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Collin Fagan <collin.fagan at gmail.com> wrote:
> I keep reading these proposals and I keep reading that public defender
> methods have "no state" and yet I can't bring myself to believe it. They may
> be intended to have "no state" but that really doesn't mean people aren't
> going to try.. and succeed... to make this multiple inheritance or traits or
Well, if the demand for this is so strong that multiple frameworks
spring up, then, perhaps, it would be a good indication that the
feature is too useful in pragmatic sense to stick to academic purity?
More information about the lambda-dev