Problem with method references
collin.fagan at gmail.com
Fri Jan 14 05:10:35 PST 2011
+1 for constructor references, that would be fantastic.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne at joda.org>wrote:
> On 14 January 2011 09:41, Rémi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> > It remember something, do we have a plan to support constructor call, I
> > mean not
> > constructor call from a constructor (this(...)) but constructor call
> > that return a newly
> > created object.
> > Something like: new#Integer(int)
> > which should be typed (int) -> Integer.
> The new#Integer(int) syntax would seem a little backwards to me, as
> the element after the # is the method name.
> I'd recommend:
> I do think this is an essential feature when adding method references.
More information about the lambda-dev