Formal model for defender method resolution
larry_cable at yahoo.com
Fri Jan 28 12:12:17 PST 2011
> What do people think? Do you find this interpretation of B (m()
> continues to use A's default) confusing or natural (or both)?
I'm not a language lawyer, however I personally find that despite the lack of
a precident in Java of (partial) signature inheritance, I think the "extension"
application of the behavior where "if not overridden, an ancestoral
is inherited" to be perfectly natural and not at all confusing; once one
the idea of interfaces having behavior and the notion of defaults this is not a
of comprehension for me at least.
More information about the lambda-dev