Simplifying sequential() / parallel()
tim at peierls.net
Fri Mar 22 08:48:58 PDT 2013
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
> Before we go there, does anyone have use cases for .sequential() /
> .parallel() that *don't* put the parallel right after the source, or the
> sequential right before a forEach?
[Assuming stateful mappers are banned:]
Even if someone *does* come up with such a use case, e.g., (using current
isn't it always possible to fake this with a custom collector that combines
y() and terminal()? (Or other mildly painful tricks.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-experts