dl at cs.oswego.edu
Wed Jun 26 15:45:23 PDT 2013
On 06/26/13 16:36, Brian Goetz wrote:
> What do we think of this name?
The royal We thinks: fine :-)
If we can't have a stunningly great name, we can at least have
a stunningly clear one.
> Shortenings might include:
> On 6/25/2013 11:37 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>> seems not too bad. It is a tad wordy, but relatively few people will
>> have to type it, and reading it is pretty clear -- this object may hold
>> a closeable resource.
>> On 6/25/2013 11:14 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>>>> These together provide something better than any other related
>>>> schemes I know. I think that if we cam up with stunningly
>>>> good names for these, the plan would be completely uncontroversial.
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers