forax at univ-mlv.fr
Fri Jun 28 08:27:48 PDT 2013
On 06/28/2013 04:18 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> Then we would cross that bridge when we get there!
I've always found that a method call with true/or false in the arguments was
not something very readable.
> On 6/28/2013 6:20 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
>> On 06/27/2013 10:43 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>>> A possible minor API cleanup:
>>> For each pair of low-level methods stream() and parallelStream() in
>>> StreamSupport, we could combine these into a single method that takes
>>> an additional boolean isParallel argument. This matches the
>>> underlying implementation they call anyway, and simplifies callers
>>> like concat, which now does:
>>> return (a.isParallel() || b.isParallel())
>>> ? StreamSupport.parallelStream(split)
>>> : StreamSupport.stream(split);
>> What if we add a third kind of stream in the future ?
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers