Request for review: 7131367 [macosx] reg test test/java/awt/Window/TranslucentJAppletTest fails
anthony.petrov at oracle.com
Thu Feb 2 04:37:48 PST 2012
On 02/02/12 15:56, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> 01.02.2012 23:00, Anthony Petrov wrote:
>> On 2/1/2012 9:06 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>> 01.02.2012 20:22, Anthony Petrov пишет:
>>>> All the other peers call super.initialize() in the beginning of
>>>> their overridden initialize() methods, and making an exception just
>>>> for the LWWindowPeer seems to be inconsistent.
>>> Well, I believe that all other components should call
>>> super.initialize() at the end too. I just have no time to test them
>>> all. Because it is cause lots of unnecessary repaints. We shouldn't
>>> initialize components after we show them.
>> I agree, partially. I believe that the setVisible() call should indeed
>> follow all other initialization. However, the rest of settings which
>> LWComponentPeer.initialize() performs should go ahead of custom
>> initialization performed by specialized peers, because custom
>> initializers may in theory tweak the general settings.
> Well, if custom initializer want to tweak the general settings, it
> should tweak it not just during initialization but during regular
> changes too? For example if sub class want to tweak its bounds it should
> do it in setBounds not in initialization. I'll create separate RFE for
> refactoring of peer initialization.
>> best regards,
>>>> Since the only reason for that is to postpone the setVisible() call,
>>>> I would suggest either introducing pre- and post-Initialize()
>>>> methods (the approach is similar to XToolkit), or there might be a
>>>> flag that could be reset in LWWindowPeer ctor that would indicate
>>>> that LWComponentPeer.initialize() shouldn't call setVisible(). Then,
>>>> the LWWindowPeer.initialize() would call setVisible() as its last step.
>>>> It just seems that having the inconsistency as present in your
>>>> current fix may hurt us in the future when e.g. we modify the logic
>>>> in the LWComponentPeer.initialize() and would expect it to be in
>>>> effect before setting additional properties for the LWWindowPeer.
>>>> best regards,
>>>> On 2/1/2012 5:02 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>> Peers shouldn't accumulate an alpha after repainting, so clearRect
>>>>> was added. And now we call setVisible for window after full
>>>>> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7131367
>>>>> Webrev can be found at:
More information about the macosx-port-dev