java.library.path fix for MacOS X (7145798)

Michael Hall mik3hall at
Mon Feb 20 17:47:15 PST 2012

On Feb 20, 2012, at 6:30 PM, Mike Swingler wrote:

> On Feb 20, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Greg Brown wrote:
>>> Flattening the prefixed keys to the top-level seems reasonable, and more in-line with existing convention. It's a good idea.
>> Cool. If you think the proposed key names make sense, I'll make that change.
> JVMRuntime, JVMMainClassName, JVMOptions, and JVMArguments sound like good names.
> It also sounds like there is demand for a JVMClassPath as well (which would logically necessitate a form of macro expansion to be able to reference inside the app bundle). Perhaps if a JVMClassPath were specified, you could turn off the automatic flat-directory scanning, to keep the rules simple and predictable.


More information about the macosx-port-dev mailing list