Dropping 32-bit support (was Branches)
swingler at apple.com
Tue Feb 21 15:19:43 PST 2012
Awesome, thanks much James.
Is there a pre-existing flag or naming convention for architecture-related build flags? Obviously we want to align with existing precedent, and get the HotSpot and JDK sides to use the same flag. :-)
On Feb 21, 2012, at 2:58 PM, James Melvin wrote:
> Yes. I can file a bug and look into this, Mike.
> - Jim
> On 2/21/12 5:55 PM, Mike Swingler wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 2012, at 2:45 PM, James Melvin wrote:
>>> One caveat...
>>> For the JVM, we've preserved 32/64-bit universal builds. Currently, the
>>> JVM universal build only includes 64-bit support. Additionally including
>>> 32-bit requires 3 Makefile uncomments. However, there may likely be
>>> additional work on the JDK side to fully support the same.
>> That's good to know, but that should really be keyed off of a build flag (which can default to 64-bit only). Should we file a CR through the Oracle bug reporter to get the process started to change this for HotSpot?
Is there someone who can help restore the 32/64-bit build-ability for the JDK side, or at least direct us as to where we can start filing a CR?
More information about the macosx-port-dev