[Fwd: Re: Enhance footprint for array initialization]
Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de
Thu Sep 4 04:14:17 PDT 2008
I had just opened a thread, about class file footprint, and the result
was, that there is some need, to enhance it's format for array
initialization using the constant pool:
From Patrick Wright I got the hint, to send you a copy of this
discussion, because you would be "pretty open to hearing requests/ideas
for enhancements to the JVM
... so here I am. 8-)
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: Enhance footprint for array initialization
Datum: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:31:28 +0200
Von: Patrick Wright <pdoubleya at gmail.com>
An: Ulf Zibis <Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de>
Referenzen: <48BC243B.7050503 at gmx.de>
<5B949BAF-FE81-4EC7-A772-C397E339E07D at sun.com> <48BE5ED5.2000308 at gmx.de>
<1ccfd1c10809031912x23b8fe6dxbc193c686ae51aca at mail.gmail.com>
<48BFB5D0.2080803 at gmx.de>
You might try re-posting on the DaVinci Machine mailing list. They are
pretty open to hearing requests/ideas for enhancements to the JVM
Currently they are focused on dynamic language support (the
invoke-dynamic bytecode), but at the very least you'll probably get a
detailed response from a senior HotSpot engineer about the
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Ulf Zibis <Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de> wrote:
> Martin, you bring it to the point in the end. Short and clear.
> About starting an JSR... I wonder that not somebody else had tried this
> in the past.
> For me, I'm afraid, that I don't have the power for it. Thanks for
> warning me.
> Am 04.09.2008 04:12, Martin Buchholz schrieb:
>> And discuss your efforts in this direction in core-libs-dev.
> Yes. from this point on it belongs to core-libs-dev.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mlvm-dev