indy and jython not getting along
Charles Oliver Nutter
charles.nutter at sun.com
Tue May 19 20:06:16 PDT 2009
Frank Wierzbicki wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:14 PM, John Rose <John.Rose at sun.com> wrote:
>> For language integration work, we should all be building from the MLVM
>> patch repo, since it is a few steps in advance of the JDK7 repo.
>> There is a small amount of new stuff beyond JDK7 (b59, M3) in there
>> now, and I am collecting more stuff to push soon.
> Great, I'm better oriented now -- though I'm having a little trouble
> with the build (likely user error) -- The "make" directions in
> mlvm/README.txt ended with an error, so I switched to the shell
> command version at the bottom. I then issued a "make clean;make" in
> davinci/sources. Does that sound like a reasonable approach? My
> assumption (could be wrong) is that the patches get applied to sources
> and so I can just do a typical make... please let me know if I'm on
> the wrong path.
The short instructions error out for me too, so I did basically what you
did and initiated the actual build myself. All is well.
Also see the instructions in langtools/meth.txt to get the hax0red javac
that can compile invokedynamic. It was very helpful for experimenting
and getting your feet wet.
More information about the mlvm-dev