Fwd: [asm] toward ASM 4.0
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Thu Aug 18 06:25:06 PDT 2011
There is a fix available in the trunk of ASM.
On 08/18/2011 11:20 AM, MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy) wrote:
> It showed up for me in generating classes within compilation tests,
> which were being loaded by a test runner. I doubt it would show up
> *From:*mlvm-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net
> [mailto:mlvm-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] *On Behalf Of *Mark Roos
> *Sent:* 17 August 2011 21:47
> *To:* Da Vinci Machine Project
> *Subject:* RE: Fwd: [asm] toward ASM 4.0
> Thanks Duncan,
> you mentioned
> One problem I have found is that in changing
> ClassWriter.getCommonSuperClass() to not
> call initialisation code they've limited it to classes loaded by the
> bootstrap ClassLoader.
> How did this show up in your code? Did you have an explicit call or
> was it incidental to just creating classes?
> I think I am ok for now as I switched to using the standard class
> loader but who know where we will end up.
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mlvm-dev