forax at univ-mlv.fr
Tue Oct 11 02:03:29 PDT 2011
On 10/10/2011 08:58 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> I agree it would be an interesting language on the JVM. It may be the
> "dynamic Java" I've wanted to make for a long time, with the added
> bonus of optional static types.
> This could almost be a weekend project atop invokedynamic.
The type system is not that simple if you want to avoid
to do one cast for each assignation (and for each method call arguments).
I think you need one supplementary day :)
> - Charlie
More information about the mlvm-dev