Request for comments: Bug 6306820
richard at kennardconsulting.com
Mon May 28 03:17:21 PDT 2007
Thanks for sticking with me - your comments and support have definitely
improved my code, and I am grateful to you as a result.
I have updated the version at...
b) Better JavaDoc around the 'parse' methods for ParameterSeparator
What we have left appear to be some fairly small details. If I may
summarise, you are saying...
1) java.net.URL is discouraged, therefore we shouldn't support it in our
API nor follow its naming convention (even though we'll sit alongside it
in the java.net package)
2) We should move the 'apply' method into java.net.URI
3) Keeping the method names familiar to javax.servlet.ServletRequest
developers is less important than neatness of code during method chaining
I'm happy either way on 1 and 2, though I disagree with you on 3, but
none of these seem like they should be major obstacles to CCC approval?
With your permission, then, I'd like to leave them to the larger consensus?
More information about the net-dev