hg: nio/nio/jdk: First installation of potential updates for M4
Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM
Wed May 27 19:44:31 PDT 2009
libman at terabit.com.au wrote:
> I compare b101 and b99.
> I had only one jdk (b58 or 59 - do not remember) for short time, while I
> b101 was not ready. Results for that jdk was identical to b101.
> The difference I noticed on WindowsXP between b99 and b101.
> Sorry for incomplete info.
> But I remember that EchoTest did 36MB/sec on b99 while now it shows
> I will investigate more.
I'll look into this after JavaOne. I suspect it is caused by 6834246
which was needed to workaround a reliability issue on Windows. b101 also
has support for thread agnostic I/O on Windows Vista and Windows Server
2008 so things are slightly faster on those editions compared to b99.
More information about the nio-dev