WatchService questions

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM
Sat Feb 27 01:10:17 PST 2010

Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
> Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
>>> :
>>> I am sorry that i actually had no time to manage my plan to create an
>> implementation that let choose the user which version to use.
>>> But i hope you think Version 2B is worth of integrating in OpenJDK.
>>> What would the next steps to be?
>> I've created this bug to track this one:
>>   6929532: (file) WatchService should avoid queuing new modify events 
>> when lots of files are changing
>> and I've put a webrev with the changes here:
>> The change to AbstractWatchKey is your changes (slightly modified but 
>> not much). It's hard to write reliable tests for the WatchService as the 
>> behavior across the 4 implementations varies slightly. So for the test I 
>> decided it would be easier to just expand the scope of an existing test 
>> - hope that's okay.
> Everthing is fine. I think your test is much better than mine. 
>> If you are happy with this then I'll get this into jdk7, listing you as 
>> contributor.
> That would be nice. Let me know if there is something to do for me after that!
Thanks. I think we're done and I'll get this into the jdk7/tl/jdk repo 
soon (should be in b88).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the nio-dev mailing list