JDK 9 RFR of 8171452: (ch) linux io_util_md: Operation not supported exception after 8168628

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Wed Jan 4 07:08:50 UTC 2017

On 03/01/2017 19:11, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com 
> <mailto:Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>> wrote:
>> Falling back when the error is ENOSYS or EOPNOTSUPP seems right, I 
>> don't see a reasonable to fallback for other errors. As to whether 
>> it's worth handling ENOSYS then I'm not sure, it would likely be very 
>> old kernels as Martin noted in his reply.
> Is this a +1 on the patch as-is or should I add ENOSYS?
The patch is okay as is, and no objection to also checking for ENOSYS if 
you want.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/attachments/20170104/071a5252/attachment.html>

More information about the nio-dev mailing list