adding rsockets support into JDK
yingqi.lu at intel.com
Fri Nov 30 19:12:36 UTC 2018
I have update the patch version 21 again with the minor Javadoc changes I have done earlier this morning. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ylu/8195160.21/
>From: nio-dev [mailto:nio-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Lu,
>Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 9:49 AM
>To: Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
>Cc: Aundhe, Shirish <shirish.aundhe at intel.com>; Viswanathan, Sandhya
><sandhya.viswanathan at intel.com>; nio-dev at openjdk.java.net; Kaczmarek,
>Eric <eric.kaczmarek at intel.com>
>Subject: RE: adding rsockets support into JDK
>We really appreciate all the help you and other OpenJDK networking
>engineers provide on this work, especially with the situation that this feature
>has software dependencies and special hardware needs for testing.
>Let's work together to make the code in good shape for integration. Even
>though we cannot make it part of 12, we can trunk it and make it ready for 13
>ahead of time :-)
>>From: Chris Hegarty [mailto:chris.hegarty at oracle.com]
>>Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 9:38 AM
>>To: Lu, Yingqi <yingqi.lu at intel.com>
>>Cc: Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>; Viswanathan, Sandhya
>><sandhya.viswanathan at intel.com>; nio-dev at openjdk.java.net; Aundhe,
>>Shirish <shirish.aundhe at intel.com>; Kaczmarek, Eric
>><eric.kaczmarek at intel.com>
>>Subject: Re: adding rsockets support into JDK
>>> On 30 Nov 2018, at 17:19, Lu, Yingqi <yingqi.lu at intel.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>> Thanks very much for the help!
>>> I fully understand that the timeline for JDK12 is very tight. Given
>>> there are
>>still two weeks till Dec.13th deadline for code integration, I would
>>like still give it a try and see how far we can make. If yes, great. If
>>not, we can trunk the code as soon as it is ready. Then JDK13 will be
>>the target :-) For CSR, we can set the target to 13 for now.
>>> Does this sound reasonable?
>>While this work is making very good progress, I just don't see how it
>>can be ready to push before JDK 12 RDP 1. I and others are prioritising
>>the code review and sending feedback, and I have more comments
>>Testing to date has been challenging for us, but we are making some
>>progress on that front.
>>The CSR Fix Version should indicate the release in which the change is
>>expected to be pushed. There can be some latency moving through the
>>various stages when such a project nears completion. At this point I
>>would be more comfortable to target 13.
More information about the nio-dev