From Christopher.Hegarty at Sun.COM Tue Aug 19 09:07:48 2008 From: Christopher.Hegarty at Sun.COM (Christopher Hegarty - Sun Microsystems Ireland) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:07:48 +0100 Subject: [Fwd: SCTP for Java] Message-ID: <48AAEFD4.4030507@Sun.COM> Hi, A request for SCTP support came up recently on the jsr203-interest list [1]. Within Sun have been working on an RFE [2] to provide a Java API for SCTP [3] that we would like to get into OpenJDK [4]. The API is nio based and defines three new channel types in order to support both the one-to-one and one-to-many styles. It provides support for both multi-homing and multi-streaming capabilities of SCTP as well as message framing, ordered and unordered message delivery. There is also support for handling of notifications from the SCTP stack, like associations change, shutdown, send failed. Initially, this work is being delivered a Sun specific API so as to gauge interest. If there is sufficient interest then we may proposed setting up a specific SCTP project [5]. At this stage we would really welcome feedback on the API [3]. Please reply to this mailing list with your comments/feedback. -Chris. [1] http://groups.google.com/group/jsr203-interest/browse_thread/thread/b10e6925e8b0b526 [2] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=4927640 [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/sctp/javadoc/ [4] http://openjdk.java.net/ [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ From JNord at ndsuk.com Thu Aug 28 04:32:52 2008 From: JNord at ndsuk.com (Nord, James) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:32:52 +0100 Subject: AsynchronousDatagramChannel Message-ID: Hi all, I noticed somewhere a while ago that AsynchronousDatagramChannel was not implemented. I can't find any changes for b94, or remember where the page was that said it wasn't implemented. Is this now implemented? Regards, /James ********************************************************************************************************* This e-mail is confidential, the property of NDS Ltd and intended for the addressee only. Any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message or any attachments by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster at nds.com and destroy the original message. Messages sent to and from NDS may be monitored. NDS cannot guarantee any message delivery method is secure or error-free. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. We do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in this message and/or attachment that arise as a result of transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NDS. To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. NDS Limited Registered office: One Heathrow Boulevard, 286 Bath Road, West Drayton, Middlesex, UB7 0DQ, United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales Registered no. 3080780 VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00 ********************************************************************************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-discuss/attachments/20080828/f848cd78/attachment.html From Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM Thu Aug 28 07:38:55 2008 From: Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM (Alan Bateman) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:38:55 +0100 Subject: AsynchronousDatagramChannel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48B6B87F.9050906@sun.com> Nord, James wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed somewhere a while ago that AsynchronousDatagramChannel was > not implemented. I can't find any changes for b94, or remember where > the page was that said it wasn't implemented. Is this now implemented? The implementations of AsynchronousDatagramChannel are not there yet (sorry about that - this is the only class in the API that is missing an implementation). You page where you saw this listed was probably the known bugs and issues page [1]. The reason the implementation is missing is because it requires a bit of code refactoring that is better happening after we push the socket-channel changes to jdk7. The socket-channel changes are need for other ongoing work and once they are pushed the implementations of AsynchronousDatagramChannel will be added (I hope within a few weeks). As regards the changes in b94 - this build was only pushed to the download site last night. It is there now [2,3] -Alan. [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/bugs.html [2] http://download.java.net/jdk7/jsr203/binaries/ [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/changes/nio2-b94.html From Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM Thu Aug 28 10:19:58 2008 From: Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM (Alan Bateman) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:19:58 +0100 Subject: nio2 build 94 is available Message-ID: <48B6DE3E.1030205@sun.com> This build fixes a number of bugs and has improvements to the file system API. In particular it makes it easier to access file system specific file attributes. This build is synchronized with jdk7-b33. Binaries: http://download.java.net/jdk7/jsr203/binaries Javadoc: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/javadoc/index.html Summary of changes: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/changes/nio2-b94.html It would be great for those interested in this API to try out this build and send feedback on any API problems or bugs you encounter. Regards, Alan.