The Next Great Thing: An Application Framework
deep.blue.6802 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 20 16:01:58 PST 2012
- I'm offering to contribute time and code.
- Daniel bring up some important questions. What is the game plan for
managing contributions? Will Oracle require an Oracle employee as a team
- There are some basic infrastructure and organization choices that need to
be made. Perhaps they've been made, but I'm unaware. Please don't make us
work on java.net :/
- Is there wiki on how to contribute?
- To answer Daniels question about version support. I think the idea is be
able to build the code on your local machine and develop against your
locally built jars and libs. That way you won't have to be worried about
the JVM stuff as much.
- 64bit vs 32bit could presents some issues, but those issues are most
likely to be seen if you are working on code below the toolkit level. The
layer above the toolkit is pure Java.
What the current thinking for getting useful contributions from the
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Daniel Zwolenski <zonski at googlemail.com>wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> Just for your info one of the challenges I have in contributing to the JFX
> code base is the whole version management side of things. Since I am
> working on deliverable projects I need my local dev environment and runtime
> to be the latest stable release. With JFX being only partially open
> sourced, there's the whole need for getting hold of these dependent jars.
> I'm scared to download and install any new versions of JFX (beta or
> otherwise) as I can't risk hurting my actual dev environment and I'm not
> entirely confident I know what the 'install' actually does and/or how and
> when the auto-updater will come into play.
> It may be an ungrounded fear but I've had a fair few issues with JFX
> browser plugins and JDK versions getting confused (probably partly related
> to the fact that I have to work with multiple JDK versions, including 32bit
> and 64bit) so I'm overly cautious. If there was a clean wiki page somewhere
> detailing the steps to get the local build running (and those steps ideally
> would not need me to actually install anything to get hold of necessary
> jars) then I may be more adventurous - does such a page exist and if not is
> there any chance we can get one? Otherwise I think I'll end up holding out
> until everything is fully open sourced and clean to build.
> The other challenge, and this will be the same for everyone, forever, is
> time. There's never enough. Currently I am splitting what free time I have
> between helping out on the forum, trying to evolve my JFX Flow project,
> contributing to this dev forum and adding to my blog to show people ways to
> build 'real' applications. Occasionally I also like to go outside and
> sometimes even socialise ;) I'm wondering what your thoughts (and the
> thoughts of people in general) are on the best use of community time? This
> kind of leads back to that community space I was rambling about a few
> emails ago - somewhere (with more tools than just this mailing list) where
> we can focus community efforts, coordinate and collaborate, and really make
> use of the big community resource pool instead of us all throwing in bits
> and pieces from the side. i.e. a revamped java.net or a total replacement
> of it with the same end goals just executed properly.
> In all brutal, practical honesty, the one area that Oracle is now
> semi-obliged (for their own self-interest if nothing else) to invest money
> and resources is in maintaining the core JFX platform/plumbing. Fixing bugs
> and sorting out those low level features that the platform requires. From a
> pragmatic perspective, it seems like the area where the community is better
> to try and add benefit is in these middle-tier frameworks, such as
> application frameworks, validation toolkits, etc.
> What's the general thinking here, how do we get maximum benefit from our
> resource pool that includes paid, full time Oracle resources working as a
> managed team and coordinated by an organised management structure, as well
> as a floating pool of part-time, add-hoc, random developers doing it for
> kicks or glory, all flying solo and all with their own ways of doing things
> and views of the way-it-should-be?
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Richard Bair <richard.bair at oracle.com>wrote:
>> I'm quite pleased with the direction of the thread. One thing that has
>> been on my mind is the need to get more community involvement in the form
>> of code contributions. As Dan pointed out, working together, we can
>> allocate engineering differently and make more forward progress. There are
>> some things which I think fundamentally should be part of the platform
>> (such as hooks in controls for validation) and other things which can be
>> outside it (like how to visualize all of those validation messages).
>> I'm quite pleased to see a bunch of JIRA features filed and much more
>> pleased to see code contributions!
>> On Feb 19, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Jeff McDonald <deep.blue.6802 at gmail.com>
>> > Insightful ideas and comments. To move things forward and to give the
>> > conversation focus I've been working on a summary and some initial
>> > write ups. The goal is to create a list of actionable items to implement
>> > which can be entered into Jira system to work from.
>> > Richard ... what would you like to see come from the discussion? Where
>> > you want to see this discussion go?
>> > Cheers,
>> > Jeff
>> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Michał Zegan <
>> webczat_200 at poczta.onet.pl>wrote:
>> >> What about things like desktop, system tray and maybe even handling
>> >> icons/similar?
>> >> It's also platform/library specific so it would be nice.
More information about the openjfx-dev