Why does this list not have a reply-to?
james.graham at oracle.com
Mon Jun 18 12:30:12 PDT 2012
Personally, I prefer lists that are configured this way. I found the
following and skimmed through it and it seems to reflect my opinions on
In my mind, catering to users who do not have a habit of choosing reply
to sender vs. reply to list when they create a reply is not as important
as preventing "I was writing a private reply to the sender containing
sensitive information or opinions and I chose "Reply to Sender"
specifically for that purpose and the email server decided it would tell
my email client to send that private reply to the list".
"Reply to list" lists make me shudder... :(
On 6/16/2012 1:15 AM, Randahl Fink Isaksen wrote:
> Sorry if this has been asked before, but why is this mailing list not
> configured with a reply-to header, so that e-mail programs can figure
> out that when we hit reply, the reply address should be openjfx and
> *not* the sender address?
> I keep accidentally writing replies directly to the sender, and I have
> noticed I am not the only one doing so.
More information about the openjfx-dev