Proposal: Deprecate Builders
tom.schindl at bestsolution.at
Thu Apr 4 04:25:16 PDT 2013
On 04.04.13 13:07, Werner Lehmann wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> On 04.04.2013 12:52, Tom Schindl wrote:
>> What I wanted to highlight is that while FXML could deal with the
>> fx-classes, it can't know what class I defined and it needs a way to
>> create instances of them, until today I could provide my custom builder
>> to it.
The problem is that if MyClass e.g. extends Pane I'm going to be in
trouble because I'd have to use deprecated code. Until you have not a
replacement to all problems a technology is solving you can't deprecate it.
Clearly there are options, for the FXML code the builder had the
advantage that the FXML-Code didn't had the hold the logic if something
was a constructor-only or generally property because it could simply run
everything through the builder, now it needs to stack up things itself.
More information about the openjfx-dev