Review request for 8169294:

Jim Graham james.graham at
Tue Nov 8 02:08:48 UTC 2016

On 11/7/2016 1:14 PM, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> The only difference in I noted is that the Java2D version has
>> an EXPAND_MIN which is 10, but you re-use INIT_SIZE, which is 20, here for
>> the same purpose.
> You're right; I think I didn't want to add an extra constant but if you
> prefer being more consistent, I can prepare another webrev.

In looking at it again, I don't think it matters since it would only 
ever be triggered if they created a path that intentionally had fewer 
than the default number of entries, so it makes more sense to always 
grow by at least the INIT_SIZE rather than a smaller number.

I think I like the new policy better than the one in Java2D...


More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list