Testing your JavaFX applications on JDK 9
jonathan.giles at oracle.com
Mon Jan 16 21:10:47 UTC 2017
Platform.firePulse() never existed, you're probably thinking of
Toolkit.firePulse() (which is not public API)?
A close replacement is Platform.requestNextPulse().
On 17/01/17 10:00 AM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
> One of the methods I use a lot in Tests, to make sure something has
> happened, is:
> runAndWait( () -> Platform.firePulse() );
> firePulse no longer exists. Is there a replacement?
> The rest seems to compile ok. But I cannot run the tests ATM.
> On 11-1-2017 20:14, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> As you may know JDK 9 has hit the feature extension complete
>> milestone . We still have a small number of weeks to fix P1-P3
>> bugs, but we need to know about them in order to fix them. Our focus
>> will be on bugs that are new in JDK 9 (regressions).
>> I ask all JavaFX developers to please download JDK 9 early access 
>> and test your application. You can report any bugs via bugs.java.com
>> . If you have any questions about whether a behavior is a bug or
>> is expected, please ask on this alias or on the jigsaw-dev alias .
>> Thank you.
>> -- Kevin
>>  http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/
>>  https://jdk9.java.net/download/
>>  http://bugreport.java.com/
>>  jigsaw-dev at openjdk.java.net
More information about the openjfx-dev