Review request: JDK-8170979: Update for Jigsaw etc. the openFX functional tests
yuri.nesterenko at oracle.com
Tue Jan 31 13:03:25 UTC 2017
And once more:
a port of JDK-8138872;
a change in javaclient/shared/screenshots/GoldenImageManager.java
to allow it find old golden images.
In the index.html there's a list of 10 files to remove after the patch
applied. Webrev script includes only 4 of them in the patch.
I tried to commit the change, jcheck has nothing against it.
We use this state of the tests (plus a closed part, and
our own svn storage for images) to run in ATR.
If not to analyze.
On 12/29/2016 04:38 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
> And again:
> (Discussion in the bug)
> Unfortunately, webrev doesn't process properly
> files deleted by 'hg rm' .
> On 12/22/2016 12:07 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>> A new version is here:
>> (trailing spaces removed).
>> See also discussion in the bug report:
>> thank you, Kevin!
>> On 12/21/2016 12:19 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>>> A gentle reminder.
>>> Without this change, we have to make All Test Run out of
>>> the makeshift workspace.
>>> On 12/09/2016 02:02 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>>>> please review this test bug fix:
>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170979
>>>> The changes are mostly in tests/functional/.
>>>> This is a merge of current testbase in
>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/9-dev/tests and whatever
>>>> we have internally. The tests should now compile and work
>>>> with Jigsaw (including b148, --add-opens), recognize already
>>>> not too new JDK directory structure, do not use Builders etc.
>>>> Small number of tests was excluded and even dropped for various
>>>> Several suites were tested with b142-b146 and PIT build for
>>>> the recent Jigsaw update (re: --add-opens).
>>>> There are still some reservations and unanswered questions.
>>>> For instance, a hard monotonous work of creation and maintaining
>>>> of the so called golden images is up to a tester: I don't know a
>>>> good place to share them between independent teams.
>>>> A couple of the suites still won't start without a minor
>>>> reconfiguration beforehand, not always properly documented.
>>>> We intend to use this state of the tests for the next massive test run
>>>> starting from jdk9 b150.
More information about the openjfx-dev