[9] Review request: 8180040: Exclude jdk.packager module from unified JDK 9 docs

Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Wed May 10 01:52:15 UTC 2017

Thanks for the review. We currently don't use package-info.java 
anywhere, but I can file a separate bug for converting all of our 
package.html to package-info.java. I can add the the missing copyright 
headers at the same time.

-- Kevin

Mandy Chung wrote:
>> On May 9, 2017, at 6:08 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Please review the following to exclude jdk.packager module from the JDK docs bundle:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180040
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8180040/webrev.00/
>> I also added a missing package description for the jdk.packager.services package (in the jdk.packager.services module), since the jdk.packager.services module will remain in the docs.
> I suggest to convert package.html to package-info.java.  Also need copyright header.
> build.properties change looks fine.
> Mandy

More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list