Dependencies on java.desktop

Tom Schindl tom.schindl at
Tue Mar 27 09:20:43 UTC 2018


Anyone else has an opinion on that? Is require static the way to go?


On 21.03.18 23:23, Tom Schindl wrote:
> Hi,
> I always thought the JavaFX-Codebase should be able to run with just the
> java.base module but I was browsing the codebase a bit and was suprised
> (or rather shocked) that even the base-module requires java.desktop.
> If I get it correct this because of the java.beans (provided by the
> adapters) stuff is found in there. Why hasn't the requires there not
> defined as:
> requires static java.desktop;
> Tom

More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list