OpenJFX GitHub mirror
kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Thu Mar 29 01:39:50 UTC 2018
I think this would be fine. We would want something that didn't conflict
with anything else and wasn't confusing. Possible choices:
Nir Lisker wrote:
> Kevin, can we get a label for this?
> - Nir
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Johan Vos <johan.vos at gluonhq.com> wrote:
>> Hi Nir,
>> About 4. (jfx-dev): you're right, I just removed that repository. That was
>> just some testing before we did the real thing.
>> As for the other points: I agree
>> - Johan
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Nir Lisker <nlisker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> A few comments about the mirror and JBS:
>>> 1. In PRs and issues on GitHub, I strongly suggest that the link to JBS be
>>> included in the top comment. If the JBS issue was created after a
>>> discussion, edit it in.
>>> 2. In JBS, I suggest to link to the GitHub mirror via More > Link > Web
>>> Link and in the Link Text use something like "GitHub mirror" (open for
>>> suggestions). JIRA renders the link in an easy to see way (easier than
>>> looking at URLs). Iv'e tried it in a couple of issues, e.g.,
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198795 and it seems preferable
>>> 3. In JBS, I suggest a new label will be used for issues which are linked
>>> to GitHub for search purposes. This is similar to the webbug label.
>>> If these are agreeable, please add them to the contribution instructions.
>>> 4. What is https://github.com/javafxports/jfx-dev? Newcomers can confuse
>>> with javafxports/openjdk-jfx.
>>> 5. When the mirror is fully ready and operational, we should advertise on
>>> community pages (like Reddit) to gather up contributors. Please keep a
>>> mental reminder when the time comes.
>>> Thanks to all who are working on this.
>>> - Nir
More information about the openjfx-dev