Compiling OpenJFX 8
kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Sat Oct 20 11:52:06 UTC 2018
This is true for building the JDK 8u. I note that if all he is trying to
do is build FX 8u, it already builds with VS 2017. The problem was he
was building FX 8 GA when what he wanted was FX 8u191. I just sent a
On 10/19/2018 7:49 PM, Stephen Fitch wrote:
> Hi Carl,
> As FYI weare getting towards the end of a major effort to allow VS2017
> to be usedto build JDK 8(inc. JavaFX).
> We are about to carry out some internal (to Oracle) final build runs with
> JavaFX/JDK 8 and VS2017.
> I'd say we need another couple of weeks to run a few builds and knock
> anyremaining issues.
> I suspect waitinghere might give you something saving you time in the
> long run.
> I'll take the AI to get back to the yourself and the alias with news.
> With OC1 next week we need a little extra time...
> On 10/19/18 19:27, carl at bekwam.com wrote:
>> Kevin R. replied to an email I put to the list about compiling with
>> Studio 2017. I'm not very good with Mercurial and thought 8.0b132
>> was the
>> most current JavaFX 8. What tag, branch, or repo would I use to
>> compile the
>> version of JavaFX 8 closest to what just shipped in Oracle's JDK
>> I'll probably make more headway with the current Microsoft tools and
>> a more
>> recent version.
More information about the openjfx-dev