RFR: 8196079: Remove obsolete Pisces rasterizer
mp at jugs.org
Sat Jul 18 17:20:41 UTC 2020
Am 18.07.20 um 17:57 schrieb Kevin Rushforth:
> On 7/18/2020 8:50 AM, Michael Paus wrote:
>> Am 18.07.20 um 17:10 schrieb Kevin Rushforth:
>>> Note that the SW pipeline still has a Pisces-based renderer for the
>>> actual rendering of primitives. This is separate
>>> from the rasterizer and is not affected by this proposed fix.
>> Just out of curiosity - why is this still needed? Wouldn't it be nice
>> to remove Pisces completely?
> We still fall back to the SW pipeline for a few cases, such as virtual
> environments without HW graphics support (Windows Remote Desktop,
> VMWare, VirtualBox), systems with insufficient graphics HW or drivers
> (mainly on Linux, but also on some Windows servers).
I think you misunderstood my question. Of course I know that JavaFX has
a SW pipeline which is used under certain conditions. My question was
why this SW pipeline still uses Pisces. The Marlin renderer has replaced
Pisces in all other areas, as far as I know. Why not also in the SW
pipeline. In how far are the requirements of the SW pipeline different
from the ones in AWT for example?
More information about the openjfx-dev