2nd round code review request: 7055363: jdk_security3 cleanup
weijun.wang at oracle.com
Wed Aug 3 19:34:18 PDT 2011
Oh, that's true.
I'll add it back. Why did I remove it at the first place?
On 08/04/2011 10:11 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> . test/javax/security/auth/login/LoginContext/ResetConfigModule.java
> You removed the "run" tag, and "build" tag is the last tag. It seems
> that the test will only run building, but not run the class.main(). I
> got the strange behavior when I run some tests with build tag with jtreg
> 4.1 b03. Did you come into the same issue?
> On 8/3/2011 11:50 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> On 08/03/2011 12:43 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> Weijun Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi All
>>> I went through the changes to the tests and they look okay to me. It's
>>> good to see so many tests removed from the problem list and the tests
>>> updated to work in samevm or agentvm mode.
>>> Is there a bug created for the ec tests that are failing on
>>> solaris-i586? If so then it would be good to include the bugID for
>> I thought there was one but I cannot find it. *Vinnie*, do you know it?
>>> future edits to the problem list. Also I see you've commented out two ec
>>> tests and I wonder if these lines should be removed or uncommented.
>> I don't understand why these 2 pass now. Maybe they still fail on some
>> platforms not in JPRT? Anyway, I just don't want to purge the lines.
>>> test/com/sun/security/auth/login/ConfigFile/IllegalURL.java - no problem
>>> with your change but I notice this test using URL's getFile which isn't
>>> the right way to get to a file path. Could this be changed to using
>> This test is a compatibility check, see
>> I remember there were some strange things on Windows, say, UNC, \ vs /,
>> that made some hand-crafted URL illegal. We cannot support all of them,
>> so just make sure the old supported ones are still supported.
More information about the security-dev