RFR 8152205: jdk.security.provider.preferred is ambiguously documented

Anthony Scarpino anthony.scarpino at oracle.com
Mon Apr 11 15:59:44 UTC 2016


Ok.. I changed it to:
{@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@link 
Security#getProperty(String) Security}

I updated it at the same link if someone wants to double check my work
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/

Tony

On 04/07/2016 11:42 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
> On 4/6/2016 6:40 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
>> In my DRBG changeset, I use this style:
>>
>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@linkplain
>> Security#getProperty(String) security property}
>
> I like this or
>
> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@link
> Security#getProperty(String) Security)
>
> Brad
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 7, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Bradford Wetmore
>>> <bradford.wetmore at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If I was doing this from scratch, I would probably capitalize it to
>>> indicate it's a java.security.Security property and add inside the
>>> @code.
>>>
>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} security
>>> ->
>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred Security}
>>>
>>> But I see it done that way in other places, so this is fine.
>>>
>>> Brad
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/6/2016 3:47 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>>>> Looks fine to me.
>>>>
>>>> Xuelei
>>>>
>>>> On 4/7/2016 5:23 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
>>>>> I need a review of this very simple doc clarification.  Calling out
>>>>> jdk.security.provider.preferred as a "security property" instead of
>>>>> just
>>>>> a "property".
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>



More information about the security-dev mailing list