RFR 8152205: jdk.security.provider.preferred is ambiguously documented

Xuelei Fan xuelei.fan at oracle.com
Wed Apr 13 00:36:39 UTC 2016


Looks fine to me.

Thanks,
Xuelei

On 4/11/2016 11:59 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
> Ok.. I changed it to:
> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@link
> Security#getProperty(String) Security}
> 
> I updated it at the same link if someone wants to double check my work
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/
> 
> Tony
> 
> On 04/07/2016 11:42 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>> On 4/6/2016 6:40 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
>>> In my DRBG changeset, I use this style:
>>>
>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@linkplain
>>> Security#getProperty(String) security property}
>>
>> I like this or
>>
>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@link
>> Security#getProperty(String) Security)
>>
>> Brad
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Apr 7, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Bradford Wetmore
>>>> <bradford.wetmore at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If I was doing this from scratch, I would probably capitalize it to
>>>> indicate it's a java.security.Security property and add inside the
>>>> @code.
>>>>
>>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} security
>>>> ->
>>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred Security}
>>>>
>>>> But I see it done that way in other places, so this is fine.
>>>>
>>>> Brad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/6/2016 3:47 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>>>>> Looks fine to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Xuelei
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/7/2016 5:23 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
>>>>>> I need a review of this very simple doc clarification.  Calling out
>>>>>> jdk.security.provider.preferred as a "security property" instead of
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> a "property".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tony
>>>>>
>>>
> 



More information about the security-dev mailing list