RFR 8051408: JEP 273: DRBG-Based SecureRandom Implementations

Wang Weijun weijun.wang at oracle.com
Wed Apr 20 01:17:17 UTC 2016


> On Apr 20, 2016, at 7:41 AM, Xuelei Fan <xuelei.fan at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> On 4/19/2016 11:41 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8051408/webrev.10/
>>>> 
>>>> Please update copyright dates.
>>>> 
>>>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/Provider.java
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 145-151:  Looks like the comment are not correct.  There are
>>>> getInstance(alg,params) since JDK 1.4 (See CertStore)
>> Yes, but in those cases, there is either getInstance(alg) or getInstance(alg,params), but not both. In SecureRandom, we are now supporting both, and a fallback is needed for those implementations that does not override new SecureRandomSpi(SRP).
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 156-157:  Fallback change the behavior significantly.  Construct with or
>>>> without parameter can be very differently.  For example, LDAP cert store
>>>> get requested, but the CertStore.getInstane(String,
>>>> LDAPCertStoreParameters) may not return an LDAP cert store.  Can you
>>>> make more comment why the fallback is OK?
>> For CertStore (and Configuration and Policy), all of its implementations only support the with-arg constructor,
> I think the constructor is not of CertStore, but of CertStoreSpi
> implementation.  

Yes.

> The provider implementation may support any kind of
> constructor (implicit or explicit, intended or not).  The constructor
> should be unknown to Provider.

Not sure what you mean, but Provider uses reflection to get the constructor and create new instances. By convention, when something is created via getInstance(alg), the SPI class would provide the arg-less constructor; when via getInstance(alg,params), it would provide the with-arg constructor.

> 
>> so NoSuchMethodException will never be thrown. Again, this fallback is only for SecureRandom now.
>> 
>> 
> Please add more comment and control so that this only apply to SecureRandom.

It already had "This is to support the enhanced SecureRandom".

Thanks
Max

> 
> Thanks,
> Xuelei



More information about the security-dev mailing list