hg: valhalla/valhalla/jdk: VarHandles for int/long arrays.
paul.sandoz at oracle.com
Thu Oct 30 10:18:17 UTC 2014
On Oct 29, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> On 10/22/2014 06:25 PM, paul.sandoz at oracle.com wrote:
>> Changeset: fff1c746733f
>> Author: psandoz
>> Date: 2014-10-22 18:08 +0200
>> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/valhalla/valhalla/jdk/rev/fff1c746733f
>> VarHandles for int/long arrays.
>> + src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/ArrayIntHandle.java
>> + src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/ArrayLongHandle.java
>> ! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/VarHandleGuards.java
>> ! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/VarHandles.java
>> ! test/java/lang/invoke/VarHandleTest.java
> Hi Paul,
> I'm wondering if for any Array*Handle.getVolatile() instead of using unsafe to get the value,
> it was not better to get the value with an array[index] and use unsafe only to emit the right fence ?
I think that is possible to do, and should result in better code generation for bounds checks. But, we still have compareAndSet/getAndSet etc.
So at the moment i would prefer to leave as is and wait for better optimization of bounds checks (and/or an intrinsic for Integer.compareUnsigned, which could also be useful in nio Buffer implementations):
More information about the valhalla-dev