VarHandles & LMAX Disruptor

Paul Sandoz paul.sandoz at oracle.com
Wed Jul 29 08:53:19 UTC 2015


On 29 Jul 2015, at 00:03, Aleksey Shipilev <aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com> wrote:

> On 07/29/2015 12:53 AM, Michael Barker wrote:
>> I definitely want all of the explicitly named accessor methods, as the the
>> "naked" get/set with the defaulting behaviour I'm indifferent.
> 
> Almost there:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132471
> 

Thanks!, pushed.

I am marginally in favour of the keeping the default accessors. FWIW they have parity with method handle field setters/getters (and of course get/putfield).

Vitaly, i think it’s ok to experiment. We can easily remove the default accessors if we eventually conclude these are more of a nuisance.

Paul.


More information about the valhalla-dev mailing list