VarHandles & LMAX Disruptor

Christoph Engelbert chris at hazelcast.com
Wed Jul 29 08:57:55 UTC 2015


> Am 29.07.2015 um 11:53 schrieb Paul Sandoz <paul.sandoz at oracle.com>:
> 
> 
> On 29 Jul 2015, at 00:03, Aleksey Shipilev <aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 07/29/2015 12:53 AM, Michael Barker wrote:
>>> I definitely want all of the explicitly named accessor methods, as the the
>>> "naked" get/set with the defaulting behaviour I'm indifferent.
>> 
>> Almost there:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132471
>> 
> 
> Thanks!, pushed.
> 
> I am marginally in favour of the keeping the default accessors. FWIW they have parity with method handle field setters/getters (and of course get/putfield).
> 
> Vitaly, i think it’s ok to experiment. We can easily remove the default accessors if we eventually conclude these are more of a nuisance.

Not sure I agree, it feels a bit like API smell to have both versions. but yeah they can be removed at any point in time.

Chris

> Paul.



More information about the valhalla-dev mailing list