Time to rebase on top of JDK 9 repository?
MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy Management)
duncan.macgregor at ge.com
Sun Oct 25 19:55:10 UTC 2015
I'm not sure the merge has gone entirely perfectly, on both windows and OS X I'm seeing a failure when building the idk images due to javadoc errors in java.anyutil. Looks like the main make files dealing with building java.base already commented out the lines adding doclint to that area so I guess there is some separate stage being invoked as part of the idk image build.
From: valhalla-dev [valhalla-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] on behalf of Timo Kinnunen [timo.kinnunen at gmail.com]
Sent: 21 October 2015 13:33
To: Maurizio Cimadamore; valhalla-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: Time to rebase on top of JDK 9 repository?
Oh yeah, I saw them
Thanks, I’ll check it out soon when I get a chance!
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Maurizio Cimadamore
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 14:06
To: timo.kinnunen at gmail.com;valhalla-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Time to rebase on top of JDK 9 repository?
I finally pulled in latest JDK 9 changesets into the Valhalla repo -
please let me know if you encounter issues.
On 29/09/15 13:58, timo.kinnunen at gmail.com wrote:
> I’ve been looking into compiling Valhalla with Visual Studio 2015 to try it out but I have hit a snag. See, I have made the needed changes and have a working build but I made the changes on top of the jdk9/jdk9 repository. I tried bringing the changes over to the valhalla/valhalla repository but the valhalla repository seems to be several months behind the JDK 9 repositories. There’s quite a lot of changes missing. Is it time to merge in the latest JDK 9 changes?
> I’m not an expert on mercurial nor familiar with the valhalla implementation details so I’m otherwise pretty much stuck.
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
More information about the valhalla-dev