Time to rebase on top of JDK 9 repository?

Maurizio Cimadamore maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Wed Sep 30 13:42:24 UTC 2015



On 30/09/15 13:56, Timo Kinnunen wrote:
> I tried this but there's quite a lot of compile errors from constructs 
> that were legal in C++11 but are not in C++14 that have been cleaned 
> in the jdk9 already. For example many macros get interpreted as 
> user-defined literals.
>
> So the merge to get these is needed.
ok - thx for trying.

Maurizio
>
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/Ox5hz3>
>
> _____________________________
> From: Timo Kinnunen <timo.kinnunen at gmail.com 
> <mailto:timo.kinnunen at gmail.com>>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 3:35 pm
> Subject: RE: Time to rebase on top of JDK 9 repository?
> To: Maurizio Cimadamore <maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com 
> <mailto:maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com>>, 
> <valhalla-dev at openjdk.java.net <mailto:valhalla-dev at openjdk.java.net>>
>
>
> I’m not sure what exactly would be sufficient, but biggest problems 
> are with reorganized C/C++ files in jdk9/hotspot and jdk9/jdk 
> repositories. I also have small changes to autoconf templates in the 
> root jdk9 repository. They are easy enough to add if the build is 
> otherwise functional.
>
> I could try with only the build changes included to see how far it goes.
>
> Sent from Mail <http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for 
> Windows 10
>
>
> *From: *Maurizio Cimadamore
> *Sent: *Tuesday, September 29, 2015 15:10
> *To: *timo.kinnunen at gmail.com 
> <mailto:timo.kinnunen at gmail.com>;valhalla-dev at openjdk.java.net 
> <mailto:valhalla-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> *Subject: *Re: Time to rebase on top of JDK 9 repository?
>
> On 29/09/15 13:58, timo.kinnunen at gmail.com 
> <mailto:timo.kinnunen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > I’ve been looking into compiling Valhalla with Visual Studio 2015 to 
> try it out but I have hit a snag. See, I have made the needed changes 
> and have a working build but I made the changes on top of the 
> jdk9/jdk9 repository. I tried bringing the changes over to the 
> valhalla/valhalla repository but the valhalla repository seems to be 
> several months behind the JDK 9 repositories. There’s quite a lot of 
> changes missing. Is it time to merge in the latest JDK 9 changes?
>
> >
>
> > I’m not an expert on mercurial nor familiar with the valhalla 
> implementation details so I’m otherwise pretty much stuck.
>
> Yep - I agree it's time to merge - it's on my radar; as a short-term
>
> measure, is there any specific changeset you need pushed in order to get
>
> up and running with VS2015?
>
> Maurizio
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
>
>



More information about the valhalla-dev mailing list