RFR(L): 8185265 [MVT] improve performance of return of value types with new calling convention
rwestrel at redhat.com
Fri Aug 11 09:47:48 UTC 2017
Here is a new webrev that addresses your comments:
I changed my mind wrt UseTLAB: I changed the code in macro.cpp so it
works with UseTLAB off.
> - As I understand, a pack/unpack handler is always set if the value type can be returned in registers. Why do we need
> the pack_handler != 0 check? Isn't the __ testptr(rax, 1) sufficient?
Yes, you're right about that.
More information about the valhalla-dev