RFR: C2: fix call with __Value arguments
tobias.hartmann at oracle.com
Mon Jun 19 05:59:08 UTC 2017
On 16.06.2017 17:57, Roland Westrelin wrote:
This looks good to me but shouldn't we also cast the receiver?
Were you able to write a test for this? If so, it would be good to add it to our test bench.
> I suppose if we hit the opposite situation (call site's
> signature uses a specific value type, callee uses __Value) we need a
> reference to the value and have to store it to memory. This mirrors what
> happens without value types where C2 casts arguments.
Do you know how this can happen?
More information about the valhalla-dev