Builds and webrevs

David Simms david.simms at oracle.com
Fri Nov 2 13:34:14 UTC 2018


On 1/11/18 1:06 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Aleksey,
>
> On 1/11/2018 8:31 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering which branches make sense to build and webrev from 
>> valhalla/valhalla repo?
>
> Depends what you want to look at :)
>
>> Currently, this builds "lworld" branch:
>>    https://builds.shipilev.net/openjdk-valhalla/
>>
>> ...and webrevs "lworld", "lw1", and "nestmates" branches:
>> https://builds.shipilev.net/patch-openjdk-valhalla-lw1/latest/
>> https://builds.shipilev.net/patch-openjdk-valhalla-lworld/latest/
>> https://builds.shipilev.net/patch-openjdk-valhalla-nestmates/latest/
>
> Nestmates was for work done prior to JEP-181 integrating into JDK 11. 
> We've just started using it again for prototyping dynamic nestmates as 
> part of expanding the Lookup.defineClass functionality.
>
>> The "lworld" and "lw1" seem to be very far behind current jdk/jdk. Is 
>> this deliberate? If so, what
>> would be the repository/revision to diff them against? If not so, are 
>> there plans to get them up to
>> speed?
>
"lw1" is a dead release branch

"lworld" - a pivot from lw1 to lw2 is underway, this is why the 
"lworld_stable" tag was added. Trail behind jdk/jdk is a little long 
now, but I don't want to disturb initial lw2. We will sync with jdk 
again once initial lw2 is going (soon, next week or two), and we can 
move the "lworld_stable" tag...so maybe wait until that happens ?

/David Simms




More information about the valhalla-dev mailing list