RFR: 8215477: [lworld] C2 should avoid value type allocations when inlining incrementally
rwestrel at redhat.com
Fri Feb 15 12:48:38 UTC 2019
Thanks for looking at this.
> I think you can use igvn.remove_dead_node(n) in compile.cpp:2082.
Right. But is igvn.remove_dead_node(n) better/different than pushing on
> Just wondering, why not always create a ValueTypePtrNode here?
I can't see when that would help. Can you think of a scenario where
having a ValueTypePtrNode as an input to a non inlined call would help?
More information about the valhalla-dev