Towards Minimal L World
john.r.rose at oracle.com
Thu May 17 04:05:01 UTC 2018
IMO, for experimental purposes any special javac check that blocks VTs from genetics needs<LW1> to have a command line switch to unblock, so we can see by special experiment where exactly VT erasure breaks generics.
> On May 16, 2018, at 7:53 PM, Dan Smith <daniel.smith at oracle.com> wrote:
>> On May 16, 2018, at 4:45 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
>> No support for any interaction between values and generics _whatsoever_ (I said minimal!)
> You clarified that this means the compiler actively rejects types like List<Point>. Not clear to me what would prompt that—it's more work for the compiler, the JVM doesn't care either way, and it's easy for users to work around (use a raw type).
> But the quality of language support will be "crappy ad-hoc" anyway, so, you know, whatever works. I'm just happy to have a compiler at all!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the valhalla-spec-experts