Towards Minimal L World
brian.goetz at oracle.com
Thu May 17 12:38:03 UTC 2018
Or perhaps that is LWn (1 < n < 10).
> On May 17, 2018, at 12:05 AM, John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com> wrote:
> IMO, for experimental purposes any special javac check that blocks VTs from genetics needs<LW1> to have a command line switch to unblock, so we can see by special experiment where exactly VT erasure breaks generics.
> On May 16, 2018, at 7:53 PM, Dan Smith <daniel.smith at oracle.com <mailto:daniel.smith at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>> On May 16, 2018, at 4:45 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com <mailto:brian.goetz at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>> No support for any interaction between values and generics _whatsoever_ (I said minimal!)
>> You clarified that this means the compiler actively rejects types like List<Point>. Not clear to me what would prompt that—it's more work for the compiler, the JVM doesn't care either way, and it's easy for users to work around (use a raw type).
>> But the quality of language support will be "crappy ad-hoc" anyway, so, you know, whatever works. I'm just happy to have a compiler at all!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the valhalla-spec-experts